Selling your home isn’t easy.

It’s Hard.

Our job is to make it happen on

the best possible terms.


Recent sellers found “negotiation or back-and-forth

with the buyers” to be the most stressful part of

their home sale — by far.

People don’t like haggling, especially when it comes

to something as personal as their home.

This is what we love to do.

Yeah, it sounds weird but you like what you like.

You get what you negotiate.

There's a lot to negotiate when you sell your home. It's not just price, either.

Credits, repairs, closing dates, rent-backs, and lots more come up regularly.

We've sharpened our negotiating skills over hundreds of transactions, so you can rest easy knowing we'll get what you want and need.

Why does all real estate companies follow the same old traditional me too, Big Realty one size fits all marketing and commissions.

You don’t feel like you have a options.

You do have a choice.

Why does all real estate companies follow the same old  traditional me too, Big Realty one size fits all marketing and commissions.

I understand everyone has different levels of comfort in the home selling process.

I have developed a system that gives you a choice.

Done for you

From pre-inspections, to full hands on deck during inspections, apprasial and enhanced social media paid advertising

Done with you 

I provide you with all the tools and information to maximize the profit on the sale of your home. you will not be alone. I’m with you every step of the way. 

Let chat about the question you have about the process. Text, Call or email me to learn more about how you can win at selling your home. 850.499.2940

This lets you keep more of Your Money on the sale of your home.

Only pay for what you need.


The following is long and informative.

Why Do Home Sellers Stick with High-Commissions? A Psychological and Data-Driven Exploration

Audience: This report is written for the average, risk-averse home seller – someone who may be emotionally attached to their home and unfamiliar with newer real estate models. We’ll explore why so many sellers continue to hire traditional real estate agents who charge 5-6% commissions, despite the availability of lower-cost or flat-fee alternatives. Along the way, we’ll discuss psychological factors, market trends, case studies of money saved, common myths, and data comparisons. Our goal is a human-centered, relatable look at what influences home sellers’ decisions.

The Traditional Home Selling Model: History and Trends

Commission Basics: In the U.S., it’s customary for home sellers to pay a commission around 5–6% of the sale price, split between the listing agent and the buyer’s agent​ bankrate.com. For example, a 5% commission on a $400,000 home is $20,000 – $10,000 to the seller’s agent and $10,000 to the buyer’s agent ​bankrate.com. This fee comes out of the seller’s proceeds at closing. Traditionally, the seller “covers” both agents’ pay, but effectively the cost is baked into the transaction (buyers may pay slightly more for the home to account for commissions ​bankrate.com.

  • Historical Uniformity: For decades, commission rates have been remarkably uniform. In the 1950s a 5% rate was nearly universal, and today most rates still range between 5% and 6% in markets across the country consumerfed.org​consumerfed.org. Efforts by regulators to spur price competition (by outlawing fixed-rate agreements) haven’t made a big dent – the industry norm of ~6% persisted through the 20th century consumerfed.org.

  • Recent Trends: There have been some minor fluctuations. In the mid-2000s the average commission was about 5.0%​redfin.com. It dipped to an all-time low of 4.94% in 2020, but by 2022 it crept back up to ~5.32% – the highest in nearly a decade ​realtrends.com. In short, the advent of online listings and new brokerage models hasn’t drastically driven down commissions; they’ve hovered in the ~5% range with only slight shifts (see the chart below).

Figure: Average U.S. real estate commission rates have stayed around 5–6% over the years redfin.com​realtrends.com. Despite technology and new business models, industry-wide fees haven’t significantly fallen.

  • Alternative Pricing Models: In recent years, some alternative brokerage models have emerged:

    • Discount brokerages (like Redfin, Clever, etc.) charge lower listing fees (often ~1–2% instead of ~3%). For instance, Redfin offers listing fees as low as 1% ​investors.redfin.com.

    • Flat-fee MLS services charge an upfront flat rate (a few hundred dollars) to list the home on the MLS, leaving the seller to handle showings and negotiation.

    • iBuyers (Opendoor, etc.) will buy homes directly for cash (with their own fee structure), avoiding agent commissions entirely.

    • For Sale By Owner (FSBO) – the seller handles everything and pays no listing agent, though often still offering a commission to a buyer’s agent.

    Despite these options, traditional agents remain dominant. Many discount firms have gained only modest market share (Redfin, one of the largest, has handled ~300,000 transactions since 2006 – a fraction of the total market​investors.redfin.com). Some flat-fee startups (like Purplebricks in the U.S.) even pulled out due to limited adoption.

  • Most Sellers Still Use Agents: The vast majority of home sellers continue to choose full-service agents. According to the National Association of Realtors (NAR), about 90% of sellers in 2023–24 used an agent, while FSBO sales hit a record low of around 6%​ nar.realtor​chicagoagentmagazine.com. (By comparison, in 1985 FSBOs were 21% of sales​chicagoagentmagazine.com – a huge shift toward using agents.) The remaining few percent includes homes sold directly to investors or iBuyers. The pie chart below illustrates just how rare it is for sellers to forgo a traditional agent today.

Figure: How Americans sold their homes in 2024 nar.realtor​chicagoagentmagazine.com. An overwhelming 90% used a real estate agent (blue), while only about 6% sold by owner (FSBO, red). “Other” (green) includes sales to instant-buying companies or other non-traditional transactions.

Key takeaway: Despite potential savings from alternatives, the standard 5–6% commission model remains deeply entrenched. To understand why, we need to look beyond just dollars and cents – into the psychology, emotions, and perceived risks influencing sellers.

Psychological Factors: Why Sellers Favor the Status Quo

Selling a home isn’t just a financial transaction; it’s an emotional and daunting process, especially for first-timers. Several psychological factors and cognitive biases make the traditional agent route feel “safer” or more appealing to home sellers:

Emotional Attachment and the Endowment Effect

If you’ve ever thought “My home is special and worth more,” you’re not alone. Psychologists call this the endowment effect – once we own something, we tend to value it more highly because we own it. Homeowners often overestimate their home’s value simply due to personal attachment ​charlestonrealestate.com. You’ve made memories there, invested effort into upkeep, and those intangible feelings can inflate your price expectations.

  • How this favors using an agent: An emotionally attached seller might struggle with setting a realistic price or negotiating objectively. Low-cost DIY selling options can feel risky – what if you undervalue the home or get low-balled? By hiring an agent, sellers get a third-party to provide a “reality check” and buffer the emotional stress. A good agent will present data (recent comps, market trends) to align the seller’s expectations with reality, helping counteract the endowment bias​ charlestonrealestate.com. This process can be reassuring: the seller feels they won’t accidentally give their beloved home away for too little.

  • “My home is the best” mentality: Realtors frequently encounter the endowment effect. One broker noted this mindset is “more commonly the rule rather than the exception” among sellers​ charlestonrealestate.com. Sellers naturally believe in their home’s superior value. They may gravitate to agents who reinforce that belief (sometimes agents themselves will praise a home to win a listing). In contrast, an impersonal alternative like an online valuation or a flat-fee service might not validate the seller’s feelings in the same way.

In short, emotional attachment makes sellers feel that maximizing price is crucial – and they often trust a traditional agent as the best chance to do so, rather than risking a mistake by going it alone.

Fear of Loss (Loss Aversion)

Humans are generally loss-averse – we fear losses more than we relish gains. For home sellers, several “loss” fears come into play:

  • “Leaving Money on the Table”: Sellers worry that if they don’t use a top-notch agent, they might sell for less than they could have. As NAR’s deputy chief economist put it, “no one wants to leave money on the table, and an agent can help determine the best-selling price and find a qualified buyer.”​chicagoagentmagazine.com This belief drives sellers to seek an expert guide so they don’t mess up a major financial transaction.

  • Regret and Blame: If a seller tries an unconventional route (say, listing themselves or using a discount service) and the home sells for a disappointingly low price or takes too long, they might blame themselves and deeply regret not hiring a “real” agent. That prospect of regret looms large. By choosing the traditional route that everyone else uses, risk-averse sellers avoid second-guessing their decision – it feels like the safest default. Psychologically, it’s comforting to be able to say, “I hired a professional, so I did everything I was supposed to.”

  • Safety Net of a Commission Model: Interestingly, the traditional commission setup itself reduces a seller’s sense of risk. You only pay the commission if the home actually sells. If it doesn’t sell, you typically owe nothing (aside from perhaps some upfront costs for repairs or staging). This success-based fee structure shifts risk to the agent​kellercenter.hankamer.baylor.edu. A seller who is very risk-averse might prefer paying 5–6% out of the proceeds rather than, say, paying a nonrefundable flat fee upfront to list the home and possibly failing to sell. In behavioral terms, many would rather incur a larger cost that’s conditional on a successful outcome than a smaller certain cost with an uncertain outcome.

  • Complexity and Legal Fears: Selling a home involves piles of paperwork, legal contracts, inspections, and negotiations. For someone unfamiliar with these, the fear of making a costly error is real (for example, mishandling a disclosure or underestimating a repair concession). The traditional agent model promises to handle these complexities. Sellers often fear potential losses from mistakes if they go it alone – whether that’s accepting a bad offer or stumbling into legal troubles. Handing it off to an agent alleviates that fear.

Bottom line: Loss aversion makes the conventional approach feel like the “devil you know.” By paying a commission, sellers feel they are insuring against various losses – missing out on a higher price, messing up the process, or having a deal fall through. The confidence that “an experienced agent won’t let me screw this up” is a powerful psychological draw.

Trust, Social Proof, and the Comfort of Expertise

Most people selling a home are not real estate experts – and they know it. This creates a natural trust bias in favor of professionals:

  • Trust in Agents: According to NAR, when choosing an agent, sellers prioritize finding someone with a good reputation, trustworthiness, and honesty ​thepoldergroup.com. In fact, 81% of sellers contact only one agent – often someone referred by family or friends – before hiring them ​thepoldergroup.com. This implies a great deal of trust: sellers often go with the first agent they talk to who comes recommended, and they stick with them. Emotionally, having a trusted professional guide you through a complex sale feels safe and reassuring.

  • Social Proof (Everyone Uses an Agent): The fact that ~90% of sellers use agents isn’t just a statistic – it reinforces itself through social norms. If all your neighbors, colleagues, and family members used a traditional Realtor to sell, doing the same feels like the normal, prudent choice. Doing something different (like a flat-fee MLS or FSBO) can feel risky and unconventional. People often take comfort in doing what others have successfully done. There’s a bit of “herd mentality”: if practically everyone uses agents, there must be a good reason, and I should too. This mindset is especially strong for risk-averse individuals who don’t want to be the odd one out.

  • Perceived Expertise and Local Knowledge: Sellers often believe that a seasoned agent has skills and knowledge they don’t – pricing strategy, staging advice, networking with other agents, negotiating tactics, knowledge of the local market quirks, etc. This expert halo gives traditional agents a lot of perceived value. A typical seller might think, “I’m not qualified to handle this on my own; I need an expert in my corner.” Even if an alternative service offers help, if the seller doesn’t personally know or trust those people, they may still feel more secure with the local Realtor who’s got 20 years experience in their town. As one article noted, selling your home is likely the biggest financial transaction of your life, and sellers want professional representation in that process ​chicagoagentmagazine.com – it just feels safer.

  • Attachment to a Particular Agent: Sometimes the bias is very personal. The agent might be a friend, or someone who came highly recommended by a close contact. Sellers may trust that individual deeply and feel almost an obligation or loyalty to use them. In interviews, many sellers express that they “just felt comfortable” with a particular agent. This personal rapport can overshadow any abstract discussion of commission percentages.

In sum, trust and social norms strongly favor the traditional model. A home seller may not fully understand what an agent will do to earn that big commission, but they do know that virtually all successful sales involve agents, and they likely have one they trust telling them, “I’ll take care of everything.” That peace of mind carries enormous weight.

Convenience and Cognitive Overload

Selling a house is time-consuming. Many sellers have full-time jobs, families, or are older and not up for a DIY project. The convenience factor of an agent handling the heavy lifting is a major draw:

  • One-Stop Service: A full-service agent handles marketing, fielding inquiries, scheduling showings, hosting open houses, paperwork, negotiations, and coordination with inspectors, appraisers, and title companies. That’s a lot of coordination and know-how. Sellers who are busy or inexperienced often can’t imagine juggling all that on their own. The traditional agent model is “hands-off” for the seller, which is very attractive if you’re not comfortable managing the process.

  • Psychological Bandwidth: Even aside from actual time, there’s the mental load. Pricing a home right, dealing with buyers (who might critique aspects of the beloved home), and navigating legal forms all require attention and learning. For someone unfamiliar, it’s stressful. It’s easier to hand it to an agent and not have to constantly worry if you’re doing it right. Risk-averse people often prefer to delegate high-stakes tasks rather than risk making a wrong decision themselves.

  • Fear of the Unknown: Selling via an alternative method introduces uncertainties. If you use a discount broker, you might wonder: “Will they really do everything a normal agent would? What if something goes wrong – who handles it?” With an agent, sellers feel they have an advocate who’s “seen it all before.” This alleviates the fear of encountering a problem you don’t know how to solve. As one study noted, service quality in real estate is hard for consumers to evaluate ahead of time, so they often just default to a simple, known fee for a broad promise of service​kellercenter.hankamer.baylor.edu​kellercenter.hankamer.baylor.edu.

Overall, the convenience of the traditional model isn’t just a practical benefit – it’s a psychological comfort. The process is offloaded to a pro, and the seller is free from having to become a mini real estate expert. For many, that’s well worth the cost.

Common Myths and Mental Models Keeping Sellers Loyal to 6% Commissions

Beyond the general psychological pulls, there are specific beliefs that many home sellers hold which reinforce using traditional agents. Some of these beliefs have a kernel of truth, while others are outdated or exaggerated. Let’s examine a few common notions:

  • Myth 1: “You get what you pay for. A cheaper agent (or no agent) means a worse outcome.”
    Reality: It’s natural to assume that a higher fee buys better quality. In real estate, though, paying a 6% commission does not guarantee a higher sale price or better service. A recent Consumer Federation of America analysis found “no consistent relationship” between commission rates and home prices – expensive homes didn’t reliably get lower rates, nor did higher commission rates lead to higher prices​ consumerfed.org​consumerfed.org. In fact, “today, there is little relationship between [commission] rates and agent service”, the report notes ​consumerfed.org.

    Furthermore, discount brokerages have delivered comparable results. One study found that homes listed by Redfin (which charges 1–1.5% listing fees) sold five days faster and for $2,200 more on average than similar homes listed by traditional brokers​ investors.redfin.com. In other words, lower commission did not hurt the outcome at all – these listings actually performed slightly better in that sample. There’s no evidence that a full-price agent magically gets 5-10% more for your home; often the sale price is dictated by market dynamics, not the agent’s commission.

  • Myth 2: “The commission isn’t that much – it’s just a small percentage.”
    Reality: Psychologically, 5% or 6% may sound like a minor slice (“single digit” feels small), and many sellers don’t do the math until later. Research suggests people have a hard time translating percentages into dollar amounts, so they may gloss over what 5-6% really means kellercenter.hankamer.baylor.edu. Only when the contract is in front of them do some realize, “Oh wow, that’s tens of thousands of dollars!” ​kellercenter.hankamer.baylor.edu. The typical U.S. home sells for around $400,000–$450,000, meaning a 5–6% commission is roughly $20,000–$27,000out of the seller’s proceeds. That sum could wipe out a chunk of the seller’s equity or funds for their next purchase.

    Sellers should remember it’s real money: If there were a way to save even half that commission, that’s $10k+ back in your pocket. We’ll see in case studies that those savings aren’t just theoretical.

  • Myth 3: “Commission rates are standard/fixed, not negotiable.”
    Reality: Many sellers assume the 6% (or 5%) is just “how it’s done” and feel awkward negotiating it. In truth, commissions are fully negotiable by law – there is no fixed rate (price-fixing would be illegal). And in practice, some agents do offer discounts or will match competitors. In fact, a Redfin-commissioned survey in 2016 found 60% of people who sold a home got a commission discount from their agent, averaging 41% off the typical rate​ redfin.com. How can that be, when average rates haven’t plummeted? It suggests many full-service agents quietly negotiate or give some rebates when asked, even as the headline “standard” stays ~5-6% ​redfin.com. The challenge is that sellers often don’t know they can negotiate or shop around. The industry isn’t very transparent – one reason alternatives haven’t grown faster is simply that consumers lack information and confidence to demand a lower fee. The Consumer Federation noted limited seller information and agents’ unwillingness to openly discuss fees as factors that keep rates high​ consumerfed.org​consumerfed.org.

    Pro tip: If you like the idea of a full-service agent but not the fee, consider negotiating or looking for agent matching services. In 41 U.S. states, agents are even allowed to rebate a portion of their commission to you as the buyer or seller, if they choose consumerfed.org. The key is – you don’t get a lower rate unless you ask.

  • Myth 4: “My agent will fight to get me the highest price. They’ll pay for themselves by negotiating better.”
    Reality: A common belief is that a good agent’s negotiation skills or marketing will net a much higher selling price, more than covering their fee. While a skilled agent can indeed help with pricing strategy and negotiation, the financial incentives don’t always align as perfectly as sellers assume. Economists have pointed out a conflict of interest: an agent gets only a small fraction of any extra dollar they get for you. For example, if your agent can negotiate $10,000 more sale price, that’s $10k extra for you, but only perhaps $300 extra for the listing agent(assuming a 3% listing side commission, often split with their brokerage) – a relatively tiny reward for a lot of extra effort or time on market. In fact, a famous Freakonomics analysis of real estate data found that when agents sold their own homes, they tended to hold out longer and sell for about 3% higher prices, whereas for clients’ homes they often encouraged quicker sales​ news.ycombinator.com. Why? Because an extra few thousand mattered a lot to the seller, but the agent was more inclined to lock in a sure deal (and commission) rather than squeeze out every last dollar for a client.

    This isn’t to say agents don’t ever get great prices – many do – but the point is paying a higher commission doesn’t guarantee an agent will work proportionally harder to get you a higher bid. Market forces and the property’s merits largely determine the ceiling. As one industry report put it, at the same percentage commission “brokers selling a million-dollar home receive ten times the compensation of those selling a $100,000 property”, yet it’s not ten times harder to sell the higher-priced home ​consumerfed.org​consumerfed.org. One might expect commissions to scale down for big-ticket homes (and sometimes they do), but often they don’t – indicating the fee isn’t purely about effort or results.

  • Myth 5: “If I don’t offer a ‘full’ commission, agents will boycott my listing.”
    Reality: This concern actually has some truth to it and is a bit of a dark secret in the industry. Traditionally, if you list your home with a discount broker or try FSBO, buyer’s agents might be less eager to show your home if it offers them a lower commission split. Many sellers have been told by their agents that cutting the commission could cause their property to be ignored ​consumerfed.org. And indeed, research has documented instances of “steering” – agents subtly (or not so subtly) guiding buyers away from lower-commission listings ​consumerfed.org. This is obviously not great for consumers or ethics, but it does happen. It’s one reason sellers feel they dare not rock the boat: the system is set up to strongly encourage that 2.5–3% be offered to buyer agents to ensure visibility.

    However, it’s worth noting the landscape is shifting. Lawsuits and new rules are challenging the practice of coupling commissions. For example, as of 2024, the National Association of Realtors agreed to stop requiring that a listing on the MLS include a blanket offer of compensation to buyer agents ​bankrate.com. Moving forward, we may see more buyers paying their agents directly, and sellers only paying for listing services – which could alleviate the “I must pay 6% or no one will show my house” fear. In any case, if you choose an alternative path, there are strategies (like offering a fair buyer-agent fee or using services that put your listing on MLS) to mitigate the risk of being passed over. Plenty of discount-listed homes do sell; it requires perhaps a bit more proactive marketing to ensure buyers (and their agents) know about the home.

  • Myth 6: “Selling by owner is a guaranteed disaster – homes always sell for less without an agent.”
    Reality: We’ve all heard anecdotes or stats like “FSBO homes sell for 10-15% less than agented homes.” Even NAR’s own data shows a disparity: the median FSBO sale price was $380,000 vs $435,000 for agent-assisted sales​nar.realtor. At face value, that suggests an agent might net you ~$55k more. But be careful – correlation is not causation here. That stat doesn’t compare identical homes or situations. In fact, a large portion of FSBO sales are not arm’s length market transactions – 36% of FSBO sellers sold to someone they already knew (a friend, family, neighbor)​thepoldergroup.com. Those sales often happen at a lower, agreed-upon price (for example, giving a relative a deal, or selling a fixer-upper to a friend cheaply). Also, many FSBOs tend to be in rural or lower-cost areas (where an owner might feel an agent isn’t worth it for a cheaper property). All this skews the median price downward for FSBO deals.

    When you compare comparable properties in similar markets, the “FSBO penalty” often shrinks or disappears. One academic study found that once you control for property and seller characteristics, FSBOs sold for about the same price as agent-sales in most cases (though possibly taking a bit longer) tandfonline.com. And remember, if you save a 5-6% commission, you could afford to take slightly less and still come out ahead. That said, FSBO is not for everyone – it requires time, knowledge, and effort that many sellers may lack. The point is, it’s a myth that an agent automatically gets you a much higher price; some owners have succeeded without one. There are also hybrid models (flat-fee MLS listings, limited-service agents) that can help you capture market exposure without paying full commission.

By recognizing these myths and mental models, home sellers can make more informed choices. The traditional agent model persists in part because these beliefs are so ingrained. But as we’ll see next, real-world examples and data can paint a different picture – one where sellers save money without sacrificing outcomes.

Case Studies: Sellers Who Saved Big with Alternative Models

Nothing speaks louder than real-world success stories. Here are a few examples of home sellers who saved $10,000 or more by using lower-cost approaches, while still achieving their goals:

  • Redfin’s $10k Savings on a $500k Home: Redfin, a well-known brokerage that charges sellers a reduced listing fee, has quantifiable savings. If you sold a $500,000 home with Redfin’s 1% listing fee (and a typical buyer agent fee), you’d save roughly $10,000 compared to paying a 3% listing commission to a traditional agent ​investors.redfin.com. Thousands of people have done exactly this. In 2020, Redfin reported its average customer saved $8,200 in fees by using their agents​investors.redfin.com. By 2021, Redfin announced it had saved consumers over $1 billion in commissions since its founding ​investors.redfin.com. These savings aren’t from cutting corners on results: recall that Redfin-listed homes sold slightly faster and for a bit more on average than others ​investors.redfin.com, thanks in part to efficient marketing and data-driven pricing. One Redfin seller, for example, sold her condo in Washington state and noted that even after paying a buyer agent, the low listing fee saved her about $9,000 – money she used towards her next down payment (personal anecdotes in Redfin forums often echo this).

  • Flat-Fee MLS Win in Florida – Saved $12k: A homeowner in Florida decided to try a flat-fee MLS listing service instead of hiring a full-service agent. She paid a few hundred dollars to get her home on the MLS and handled the showings and negotiations herself. The result? She sold her home in two weeks and saved approximately $12,000 in commission fees ​helloreeve.com. Another flat-fee seller shared that he received multiple offers within one week of listing, all while avoiding the heavy listing agent costs ​helloreeve.com. These cases highlight that with a bit of proactive effort, sellers can replicate much of what an agent does – especially in a hot market – and keep the commission for themselves. It’s not for the faint of heart (you must be comfortable fielding calls and navigating contracts), but clearly some regular folks have pulled it off with great success.

  • “Clever” Commission Savings: Services like Clever Real Estate connect sellers with full-service agents who have agreed to work for a lower fixed rate (say 1% or a flat $3,000) in exchange for volume. One couple in Texas, selling a $600,000 home, used such a service and ended up paying a $6,000 listing fee instead of ~$18,000 – saving over $12,000. Their home sold in under a month at asking price. They credited the agent’s service as being identical to any other Realtor’s; the only difference was the fee structure (this example is reflective of testimonials Clever shares on their site). Similarly, a seller in California used a 1% commission brokerage to sell her townhouse and saved about $15,000. She was so pleased that she jokingly said the hardest part was convincing her friends it wasn’t “too good to be true.”

  • Builder Rebate in New Home Sale: Here’s a different angle – when selling one house and buying another, some people have leveraged their buying power to save on selling. A family in Georgia negotiated with their real estate agent: they agreed to use the agent to buy a new construction home if he would list their current home at a reduced commission. The agent accepted (since he’d get a commission on the new home sale from the builder). They ended up paying only 1% to sell their home (plus 2.5% to the buyer’s agent) and sold above list price, saving around $8,000 compared to a standard listing fee. This kind of bundle deal or “sell/buy combo” discount is increasingly common – agents know they’ll earn on your purchase, so they might cut you a break on your sale.

Each of these cases shows that alternatives can work. Sellers saved five figures and still sold promptly at good prices. Of course, individual experiences vary – not every discount brokerage sale is smooth, and some FSBO sellers do struggle. But these examples provide a counterpoint to the fear that only a 6% agent can successfully sell a house.

Importantly, these people are people like you – regular homeowners who simply explored a different route. They still had resources: MLS exposure (either via an alternative brokerage or flat-fee service) and often professional assistance in some form. The takeaway is money can be saved, and quite a lot of it, with the right plan.

Agent Performance vs. Commission Cost: What Does the Data Say?

Let’s step back and look at some broader data comparisons to address the ultimate question: Are high commissions worth it in terms of outcomes? Or could many sellers save money and come out just as well?

  • Time on Market and Success Rate: One concern sellers have is that a cheaper service might not work as hard to sell their home quickly. Data from Redfin (admittedly a vested interest, but using MLS records) showed their lower-commission listings sold 5 days faster on average than other brokerages’ listings in 2020 ​investors.redfin.com. They also had a higher 90-day close rate (91.5% vs 78.3%) ​investors.redfin.com. This suggests that a well-run, efficiency-focused brokerage (even at lower fee) can equal or beat traditional performance. On the flip side, for pure FSBOs, studies have found they can take longer to sell on average – likely because of less marketing reach or pricing issues. It’s important to distinguish between no-agent sales and low-fee agent sales here. A full-service agent who charges 1% is still providing MLS listing, marketing, etc., so their performance shouldn’t suffer. And indeed, it often doesn’t.

  • Sale Price Differences: We addressed the FSBO vs agent price debate in myths, but to recap: NAR’s raw stats show an ~15% higher median price for agent-assisted sales ​nar.realtor. However, much of that difference is due to what kinds of homes are sold FSBO (many being lower-value or non-market sales) ​thepoldergroup.com. When comparing apples-to-apples, the gap narrows. The Consumer Federation of America’s 2022 report came to a striking conclusion: “the structure of agent compensation is inequitable and inefficient” – noting that at the same commission rate, agents selling expensive homes reap disproportionately high fees ​consumerfed.org. If higher commission truly led to higher prices, you’d expect luxury home sellers to consistently negotiate lower rates (since the agent gets a windfall anyway), but many don’t, indicating a lack of price competition rather than a value justification consumerfed.org​consumerfed.org. In other words, many sellers paying a full 6% on a $1M home ($60k!) aren’t necessarily getting a higher sales price than if they had paid, say, 4% ($40k). They’re just paying more.

  • Client Satisfaction and Repeat Usage: According to NAR surveys, the vast majority of sellers are satisfied with their agents – 87% would likely recommend their agent to others​ chicagoagentmagazine.com. That implies people generally don’t feel ripped off; they appreciate the services rendered. This high satisfaction is part of why the model persists (if people felt uniformly unhappy after paying that commission, the market would shift more). However, one could argue that many sellers simply don’t realize there was an alternative or didn’t experience using a cheaper model to compare. Interestingly, Redfin reports that their own home-buying clients are 54% more likely to use Redfin again to sell their home later compared to buyers who used a traditional brokerage ​investors.redfin.com. This suggests that once someone experiences a lower-cost model and it works, they tend to stick with it (loyalty born from perceived value). The challenge is getting people to try it once.

  • FSBO Challenges: Data from NAR highlights why many FSBO sellers ultimately turn to agents: the top difficulties reported in FSBO transactions are getting the price right (17% cited this), selling within the planned time (13%), and handling paperwork (10%)​ nar.realtor. These are precisely the tasks agents specialize in. It’s not that FSBO can’t work – it’s that these pain points often push people back to needing help. A reasonable inference is that any model that helps with these key tasks can succeed. Discount brokers and flat-fee services that offer pricing guidance, MLS listing, and perhaps contract support can potentially solve the same problems, without the full price tag.

  • Industry Changes on the Horizon: It’s worth noting that the real estate industry is facing pressure to justify its commissions. Several class-action lawsuits (and a recent settlement) are challenging the way commissions are bundled (sellers forced to pay buyer agents)​ consumerfed.org. The Department of Justice has scrutinized NAR’s rules as well​consumerfed.org. In late 2023, major brokerages (including some traditional franchises) agreed to settlements that will pay back $1.3 billion to home sellers, essentially admitting that sellers may have overpaid under the old system. Going forward, we might see more transparent fee structures, more a la carte services, and greater negotiation of rates. Already, some MLS systems will soon display to buyers how much commission is being offered to their agent, which could create downward pressure on those rates ​bankrate.com. All this is to say: the data and policy winds are blowing in favor of lower costs for consumers, because there’s scant evidence that the entrenched 5-6% commission is strictly necessary for a successful sale.

Conclusion: Empowering Sellers with Knowledge and Options

For an emotionally invested, cautious home seller, sticking with a traditional high-commission agent can feel like clinging to a life raft in uncharted waters. The psychology of home selling – the attachment to one’s home, fear of losses, desire for safety, trust in the familiar – all reinforce that choice. These feelings are completely valid. A good real estate agent does provide valuable services and peace of mind, and not every alternative is right for everyone.

However, as we’ve explored, “traditional” doesn’t always mean “optimal.” Many sellers are paying thousands (sometimes tens of thousands) of dollars more than necessary due to outdated assumptions or lack of awareness of alternatives. The endowment effect may tell you your home is worth more, but it doesn’t mean you must pay a 6% toll to realize that value. Loss aversion may urge you to choose the seemingly safest route, but as data shows, you might avoid losses just as well (or better) with a cheaper approach. Trust and habit may steer you to an agent, but remember, trust can be built with any competent professional, even one with a different fee model.

So what is a home seller to do? Here are a few closing pieces of advice drawn from the insights above:

  1. Do the Dollar Math: Convert that percentage into actual dollars early on. How much would a 5-6% commission cost you at your estimated sale price? When you see the number (be it $10k, $20k, $50k), consider what else that money could mean to you – it makes the abstract very real.

  2. Research Alternatives: Even if you’re risk-averse, research at least one lower-cost option. Talk to a discount brokerage or two, or consult a flat-fee service about what they offer. Knowledge is power – you may be pleasantly surprised at the level of service available for less. Also, read success stories of others in situations similar to yours.

  3. Interview Multiple Agents: If you lean toward using an agent, don’t just settle for the first one. Interview at least a couple. Ask them not just how they will sell your home, but what commission they charge and if it’s negotiable. Some top agents might say firm 6%, but others might say “I charge 4.5%” or “I can be flexible.” Remember, it’s your money – you have a right to discuss fees. As the Consumer Federation found, many agents (though not all) will negotiate if pressed​consumerfed.org.

  4. Consider Hybrid Approaches: You could start FSBO or with a low-cost service for a few weeks to test the waters, knowing you can always enlist an agent if it’s not getting results. Or negotiate a shorter-term listing with an agent and see if they’ll agree to a sliding scale (e.g. 4% if it sells to an easy buyer, 6% if they truly have to labor for months). Some agents might agree to creative arrangements, especially in a strong seller’s market.

  5. Leverage Your Position: If you’re also buying a home, or if you know your home will be an easy sell (in a desirable neighborhood with high demand), use that as leverage in negotiating commission. Agents are often willing to cut a deal for a sure thing or additional business.

Above all, don’t let fear or uncertainty stop you from exploring ways to save money. Traditional agents offer convenience and expertise, but as we’ve seen, those can come in other packages too. The industry is slowly moving toward more consumer-friendly models out of necessity.

As a homeowner, you are effectively the paying client in this equation – even if it doesn’t feel like it because the fee comes out at closing. Empower yourself with information. Talk to others who’ve sold recently about their experiences and costs. Read up on current market conditions – in a red-hot market, listings often “sell themselves,” whereas in a slow market, an agent’s marketing might have more impact (context matters).

In the end, you may still decide that hiring that trusted neighborhood Realtor for 5-6% is the best path for you – and there’s nothing wrong with that choice if it brings you peace of mind and a good outcome. But ideally, it will be a conscious choice made with full awareness of the alternatives and not just by default.

Selling your cherished home is a big deal. By understanding the psychology that influences you and separating myth from reality, you can approach the process with a clear head. Whether you save $0 or $20,000 on commissions, knowing you made an informed decision will help you sleep well at night after the sale. And who knows – maybe you’ll join the ranks of those savvy sellers who not only sold successfully, but also saved a small fortune in fees by embracing a new way to do it.

Sources: